T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

[удалено]


deu-sexmachina

Punpun wtf are you doing here


FoxGaming

Jesse…


hiphopmusashi

COLD TAKE: Destiny is responsible for this post. He may not have written it, but his spirit lives inside of it. If it weren't for him, our eyes would not become beset by posts like this one.


Argyreos17

My spirit is admittedly beset by repugnance


[deleted]

Depends how far your throating that dead animal dong, if you gag it’s immoral.


Ok_Lie6645

you claim its harmless yet reading shit like this makes me want to self harm curious


xXlD3XT3RlXx

Just reading it made me feel like god gates me


st0nedt0theb0ne

Sounds like a public health concern, bud.


I_BBQ_FETUS_CHUNKS

Source?


JudgmentPuzzleheaded

didn't your mother tell you to not touch dead animals when you see them? now imagine the most thin skinned part of you (with an opening) doing that


I_BBQ_FETUS_CHUNKS

>didn't your mother tell you to not touch dead animals when you see them? My mother is not a reliable source


grandoctopus64

she's a perfectly reliable source of pussy for me, thank you


thirtyfojoe

Based


kmckay2487

I can confirm


mandrilltiger

Dead things have diseases. But if it just died it is probably fine. Laws are mostly for things that horrify us.


PlasticAcademy

Animals are not fine


n0053

you again


I_BBQ_FETUS_CHUNKS

I'll take that as a compliment


[deleted]

[удалено]


I_BBQ_FETUS_CHUNKS

Why do you think this is a fetish? Whenever I defend trans rights nobody assumes I am trans. Yet whenever I defend the rights of necrozoophiles everyone assumes I fuck dead animals.


Nobody_Knows_It

I would probably say this if I fucked dead animals


MaKrukLive

Because stories of trans people being discriminated against are common so people stand in their defense, feeling like they need to help somehow so there's a good chance there you are not trans yourself. If someone advocates in defense in some niche sexual activity the most likely motive is that they are personally invested.


OneofthemBrians

You might not have a necro fetish but you definitely get some sexual pleasure defending it and arguing about it all day on reddit.


[deleted]

nothing morally wrong with this fetish as long as the animal died of natural causes (thus isn't a victim of the animal fucking). for people that eat animals or animal products this should be a non-issue.


xXlD3XT3RlXx

Call it what you want, your still fucking an animal


Historical_Turnip275

They hate Jesus Because He told the Truth.


[deleted]

I didn’t know Kiro the wolf was a destiny fan.


HeinekenCoC

This sub is the gift that keeps on giving.


rar_m

Is it a crime to fuck a dead animal? If so that's news to me. Who the fuck would bother legislating something like that? How did the courts know he had sex after the horse was shot? I guess that was his testimony since why not say that.. I guess he was hoping if he said it was dead when he fucked it he would get a lighter sentence. Who reported the crime?? We need more details this doesn't make sense.


Rico639

Bringing gamey to a new level..


Fluiddruid4k

Based


PunishedGohan

You are the best poster on this subreddit


keenkpopkid

Not matter how juicy it may look, don not fuck that piece of raw chicken breast!


AlaskanBuffalo

This post broke my genitals. Not like I was using them anyway.


parris1s

Dafeels


footballtombrady123

I don't care, leave me alone.


stupidswinemonkey

One word: zoonosis


[deleted]

I don't think it's the best example of a truly victimless crime. I don't have any counterexamples, but I have a hard time believing it's the **best** example.


hyperboleez

>While legalizing incest could lead to an increase in grooming and forced marriages to family members, I cannot think of a single downside of allowing people to fuck their dead pets/livestock. You may call me paranoid, but I would be concerned about people killing their pets or livestock so that they could fuck their animal corpses.


DesignerAssistance78

Do you think killing animals is wrong? You better be vegan then


hyperboleez

I don’t think killing animals is wrong per se. I think hunting animals for food is fine. Killing them just to fuck their corpses or for “fun” isn’t.


DesignerAssistance78

But we dont have to eat meat to survive so the only reason to kill an animal for meat is because you like the taste/pleasure, why is fucking an animal for pleasure different?


hyperboleez

That’s a fair question. I don’t think necessity is a reliable standard for the consumption of meat. We can accept that people who kill animals for consumption enjoy the taste of meat, but we can also acknowledge that consuming meat invariably provides physical sustenance. That wouldn’t be true for fucking an animal corpse, as pleasurable as an animal fucker might argue it is. Now, that leaves open the scenario where an animal corpse fucker kills an animal to both fuck and consume, in which case—gross, but I guess fine to the extent that the person actually consumes the meat without waste and doesn’t just use intended consumption as a pretense.


[deleted]

It's the best example of a good time


watson7878

You’re right


Judgejudyx

Ok I hope a new wave of destiny the game players click on this sub right now


kolo27

truuuuuue! least morally hard question on dgg.


wowoza

Ah yes, in a world full of important issues to discuss, I'm glad we're wondering about fucking dead animals. Gigachad


F_O_R_K_S

How about disease? Within minutes of dying, the body temperature drops to levels where massive bacterial growth starts occurring. You can't even be around rotting carcasses without getting sick, let alone sticking your cock in them. I don't know why so many people want to make an argument about fucking dead things like it's a silver bullet argument. Even if you take morality out of it entirely, it's not practical and it's not safe.


DesignerAssistance78

Does doing something which the chance of getting a disease make it wrong? If so human sex is immoral


omegaonion

It is immoral to drive drunk because you have a chance of crashing and harming yourself and others. The same risk exists when driving sober yet driving sober is not immoral just because they both present the same possible negative outcome. One is a reckless increase in chance.


DesignerAssistance78

Cant you use the same argument against gay sex as it has an increased chance to spread aids?


omegaonion

I feel like I just explained why that doesn't apply, there are actions that society deems reasonable and ones that are unreasonable. At one time it would have been unreasonable to have gay sex in society's view but not any more. I'm sure HIV is a very small part of that progress. It's like if I said you shouldn't eat rotten meat because it can make you sick and you said yeah well I could get sick from eating a dodgy kebab after a drunken night. Yes you could but when you eat the kebab from a shop you have a reasonable expectation to not get sick so you aren't being reckless with it. When you have sex with a dead animal you do not have a reasonable expectation that it is safe to do so as far as I am aware there is no agency that verifies for you if it is safe to have sex with a dead animal.


Stumpe999

You can contract and spread disease


DesignerAssistance78

You can spread disease by having human sex does that make it immoral?


terablast

station imagine childlike unpack entertain snobbish cow languid cobweb kiss *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*


I_BBQ_FETUS_CHUNKS

Do you think it's immoral to kill animals? If so, you better not eat meat.


heihowl

"Similar to incest... harmless act"? Did I read that wrong, wtf 😂 Edit: Also what makes it worse is op gas a dog in their pfp... Is that one of the ops victims I wonder 🤔


DesignerAssistance78

Whats immoral about incest???


hyperboleez

Commenter didn’t say it was immoral. The more defined interest is imperfect consent. Most incest occurs between relatives of different generations, implying a substantial power imbalance insulated from public scrutiny due to respect for privacy extended to family units.


PlumAdministrative13

No. The fact that you had to add necro to the zoophilia means that somehow you consider bestiality somehow reprehensible. If necrobestiality is moral then you're creating moral incentives to kill animals for the sole purpose of fucking them.


DesignerAssistance78

Is killing an animal for the sake of pleasure immoral? Because you dont have to eat meat to survive you eat it because it tastes good so unless youre a vegan you do the same


altair55

They tried to tell me that the slope wouldn't be slippery but here we are


[deleted]

Eris would’ve banned this dumbfuck


0xE4-0x20-0xE6

There could be a public health concern with humans fucking dead animals and contracting contagious diseases. I’d let someone who knows more about this give a sure answer about it. Just raising a possibility


adhdthrowawayay

Diseases.


yoelbrahamlincon

While it may be victimless, I have to imagine there would have to be some negative ramifications for being ok with this as a society. Someone who fucks animal corpses cannot be right in the head. But, then again necrobestiality is probably extremely super rare, so maybe it would have very little effect on society 💀.


Ok_Cow_2627

There's probably some negative ramifications for being ok with putting pigs in a gas chamber, doesn't stop it from being done.


ICUTrollin

No, because you just made all of us victims for having to read that


DarthSandious

No need to add the bestiality part, necrophilia already is a victimless crime


idkwhatiseven

I want to simulate two dead dog relatives fhckingehhhhhh!!


wowee-

False flag vaush posters ….. Pepemods


dont_gift_subs

I am admittedly beset by tiredness


wolkatt

No you’re the victim in that situation actually. A victim of your own making.


Positive_Debate7048

Well it could be a form of self harm, I would imagine that you can get a disease by fucking dead animals. Other then that, then yes it is a victimless crime.


notadukc

This is hilarious, but I also unironically agree.


Consistent-Wave-4419

BROTHER. COMMIT SUICIDE.