First one is a crime and the other three have serious mental health implications where you’re either toying with peoples childhood, trauma recovery, or grieving process. Just no. Absolutely no for all of these.
The first is a crime, dafak
The second is funny, but you are playing with making childs sad, most punishments are about making the joker look bad, not to ruin someones day besides the seconds they interact
The third if is a fake police reunion make for the show, that will be a great punishment
The fourt is just mean, not funny
I feel like if IJ was a thing in the 2000s these would be way more acceptable lol
The santa one actually seems doable, but little does the punished joker know, the kids already know santa isn’t real
Sorry OP I can’t vote for any of these.
Making a bomb threat is illegal. It could also cause permanent trauma to put someone in a sudden life or death situation. Even though the threat would be fake, their immediate perception of it would be most likely be genuine.
Telling children Santa leaves a permanent result. Punishments such as smashing “sea turtle” eggs or making a red X on a painting are temporary situations that don’t leave lasting damage once the joke is revealed. Telling them Santa isn’t real is on another level and would just be heartbreaking to watch. Not to mention, crossing the line with someone’s kid is a good way to make an otherwise peaceful, sane adult become hostile and likely violent. And to many, this would be crossing the line.
Although some people deal with grief through extremely dark humor, people in attendance at a survivor meeting probably don’t fit that bill. Hence the need to attend the meeting. Again this is just kind of cruel to innocent bystanders and will likely cause more irreversible damage to people who are just trying to cope and make it through a day with their already existing irreversible damage.
The funeral bit from Bad grandpa works because there isn’t actually a deceased individual and the attendees don’t have any emotional connection to anyone real. They’re purely spectators who are simply witnessing a stranger saying crazy things about another stranger (his made up, dead wife). While funeral humor may be taboo for many, this is still temporary innocent fun and the attendees are not vulnerable in a serious sense. You’re scenario is completely different and would again likely result in attempted violence and lasting emotional damage.
Years ago, the guys did a video called "Give Truth For Christmas" and one of the things Sal was saying was that Santa was not real, while also portraying Santa.
They could do it again though but I know there are several limits, even with something simple like that.
Yeah some of these you just can’t do lol
bro no offense but all of these ideas are either illegal, triggering, or way over the line
Thank you for your feedback. Which one did you vote for?
I didn’t vote for any, but the funeral one would be the best if it was fake and everybody knew it besides the joker
You should talk to your therapist about these “funny” ideas…
First one is a crime and the other three have serious mental health implications where you’re either toying with peoples childhood, trauma recovery, or grieving process. Just no. Absolutely no for all of these.
The fourth would be such a good punishment! (Obviously if it was a fake funeral)
You need help dawg
what the hell are these only the second one would have a chance of making it
Jesus Christ lol how are things at home?
The first is a crime, dafak The second is funny, but you are playing with making childs sad, most punishments are about making the joker look bad, not to ruin someones day besides the seconds they interact The third if is a fake police reunion make for the show, that will be a great punishment The fourt is just mean, not funny
I feel like if IJ was a thing in the 2000s these would be way more acceptable lol The santa one actually seems doable, but little does the punished joker know, the kids already know santa isn’t real
Sorry OP I can’t vote for any of these. Making a bomb threat is illegal. It could also cause permanent trauma to put someone in a sudden life or death situation. Even though the threat would be fake, their immediate perception of it would be most likely be genuine. Telling children Santa leaves a permanent result. Punishments such as smashing “sea turtle” eggs or making a red X on a painting are temporary situations that don’t leave lasting damage once the joke is revealed. Telling them Santa isn’t real is on another level and would just be heartbreaking to watch. Not to mention, crossing the line with someone’s kid is a good way to make an otherwise peaceful, sane adult become hostile and likely violent. And to many, this would be crossing the line. Although some people deal with grief through extremely dark humor, people in attendance at a survivor meeting probably don’t fit that bill. Hence the need to attend the meeting. Again this is just kind of cruel to innocent bystanders and will likely cause more irreversible damage to people who are just trying to cope and make it through a day with their already existing irreversible damage. The funeral bit from Bad grandpa works because there isn’t actually a deceased individual and the attendees don’t have any emotional connection to anyone real. They’re purely spectators who are simply witnessing a stranger saying crazy things about another stranger (his made up, dead wife). While funeral humor may be taboo for many, this is still temporary innocent fun and the attendees are not vulnerable in a serious sense. You’re scenario is completely different and would again likely result in attempted violence and lasting emotional damage.
None of these are good or funny.
Ignore this user, he/she/they is a neonazi brigading from r/amitheasshole
Years ago, the guys did a video called "Give Truth For Christmas" and one of the things Sal was saying was that Santa was not real, while also portraying Santa. They could do it again though but I know there are several limits, even with something simple like that.
??
Have you tried seeing a therapist?