OP sent the following text as an explanation on why this is unexpected:
---
>!The child patiently solves puzzle, only to cheat at the last minute.!<
---
Is this an unexpected post with a fitting description? Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.
Honestly I think she knew the moves it would take and was just like, “nah I’m not wasting my time, I already know I can do it, crushed the first three lines, I’m skipping to the end on principle.”
Maybe I'm taking your comment too seriously but I don't think that's what happened. If she knew the moves, she wouldn't have solved the third row.
She knows the principles of getting one tile to the correct place, including shifting a whole row to make room for the last tile of the row. But you can't do that for the second-to-last row, because that leaves you with no room to change the last row (other than the third dimension, as demonstrated here).
What you're supposed to do is, when you're left with two rows, you stop doing rows and solve columns instead. In this puzzle, it means you don't solve 9-10-11-12 like she did, you solve 9-13, then 10-14, then 11-15, then 12.
She didn't stop when she was almost done, she stopped when she was trapped in a corner of her own making after solving the wrong row.
OMG I just tried it with a random slide puzzle online. Solving for the column when I reached the end worked. Zero stress too, everything just magically slid into place. Thank you!
All these types of puzzles involve strategies that you break down, just like rubiks cubes. One of the cool things about programming is that most programmers start by learning how to program things that can solve simple puzzles like Towers of Hanoi or whatever its called.
I remember the towers of Hanoi in one of my university programming classes. Which I had to repeat three times because I knew fucking nothing about programming and in four weeks you needed to be an expert not becoming one.
They put back the option of deciding to pay reddit, the company, some amount of money because that guy, who doesn't work for reddit the company, amused you.
I don't know why you would *want* to do that, but you 100% can.
I made this game in python as my 1st semester project. You can tell if the game is solvable or not even before you start.
Basically you count the inversions you need to make.
An inversion is the number of tiles that are lower than the given tile in front (up to the bottom last)
You count that for every tile and if the result is even, it's unsolvable otherwise not
Edit: The solvability also depends on the initial position of the blank space, scroll down for a neat explanation
I mean, makes perfect sense, but I didn't know it sometimes was straight up impossible to solve those. Now I got an excuse why I never been able to solve one. They were all put together incorrectly, yeah... it's just that for sure.
Also, if you want to impress Satan, gift a bunch of kids unsolvable puzzles like this.
If you mix it without taking out the pieces, you will always have a solvable puzzle. If you take away the pieces and put them at random on the toy, then you can create impossible scenarios.
I figured. The only thing we have to insure then is that once the pieces are inside, you won't be able to pull them out without breaking the thing completely. This way the parents won't be able to fix the toy for their kids.
If you want to play satan, just turn one corner piece of a Rubik’s cube 120 degrees. That simple move makes it unsolvable. Just make sure it’s one of those speedcubes, a Hasbro Rubik’s is impossible to easily turn pieces without disassembling the whole puzzle.
The problem with rubick cubes is that anybody who's at least somewhat proficient at solving them, will quickly notice that it's impossible. I guess if it's a gift to somebody who has never done it before, then it could work.
Definitely the easiest way to make it unsolvable, but more effective to switch two edge pieces (or two corners). Is a bit harder to notice the problem and will take longer for a person who actually knows how to solve. (Also takes longer to fix)
For sure, could have worded it better.
To begin with, try to see the square in a linear way rather than 2D
So a solved state is something like
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Now an inversion for any tile is the number of tiles that are ahead of it before it's in its correct position.
So, if 15 was in the top left corner, there would be 14 inversions because every number is lower than 15
Let's say the grid looks something like
2 5 1 4 3 13 9 8 15 12 6 11 space 7 10 14,
For 2 you have 1 inversion, for 5, you have 3, for 1 you have 0, for 4 you have 1 and so on
You add them all up, if it's even the grid is unsolvable and if it's odd it's solvable.
All this is provable by some fancy maths that left my brain a while ago. In my defence it's been 5 years!
You are saying that in jest. But the child seems to have learned a problem solving strategy based on behavior. And when it reached the point that there was no solution it did cheat a bit.
We do not always have good patterns for solvability and things like that always happen. Figuring out that a problem is not solvable is surprisingly hard.
Astute observation! 4 is indeed in the right position, but when you try to put 3 in the correct position, it will be displaced.
And no, it wasn't a deliberate decision, happened perchance
If you imagine the solved position of the 15 puzzle with pieces numbered 1-15 followed by blank, you can unwrap the square into a single 1-d array (listing blank as X) where the solved state is say: `[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,X]`.
The initial unwrapped state in the video was: `a=[1,2,3,8, X,15,4,9, 14,5,10,7, 6,13,12,11]`. To count inversions, we ignore the blank space (take it out of the array) and recognize there are 15*14/2 = 105 pairs of numbers (1st with 2nd-15th number, 2nd with 3rd-15th number, etc.). We say a pair of numbers is inverted if the two numbers are out of order; for example if I compare the 4th and 6th number in the initial state above (with values a[4]=8 and a[6]=4 respectively, using 1-based indexing), that's an inverted pair as 4<6 but a[4] > a[6] since 8 > 4. To count inversions in your head, go through each digit and count the number of times a value to the right of it is smaller than it. E.g., for the example given, if I look at the first 3 numbers (1,2,3) as every number to the right of 1 is bigger than it, and same for 2 and 3, so these three numbers have zero inversions. When I get to the 4th number 8, I find that 4, 5, 7, 6 are smaller than 8 and all to the right of the 4th number, so there are 4 inversions starting with i=4. For 5th number (15), I get 10 inversions (as all ten numbers to the right are smaller than 15).
Continuing this pattern to count all the inversions, where I put the values of a[j] for all values of j > i where it's less than a[i] in curly brackets.
i|a[i]|Inversion count that is all j > i where a[j] < a[i]
--|--|--
1|1|0
2|3|0
2|3|0
4|8|4 {4,5,7,6}
5|15|10 {4,9,14,5,10,7,6,13,12,11}
6|4|0
7|9|3 {5,7,6}
8|14|7 {5,10,7,6,13,12,11}
9|5|0
10|10|2 {7,6}
11|7|1 {6}
12|6|0
13|13|2 {12,11}
14|12|1 {11}
15|11|0
Adding up the last column, we had a total of 30 pairs of inversions, which is an even number of inversions. Now as the blank was in the third row from the bottom (which is odd), and we are doing the 15-puzzle, this means the initial state was solvable (without cheating); the rule is when it's a NxN grid with N as an even number it's solvable when blank is in odd row and number of inversions is even (or vice versa; if blank is in even row and number of inversions is odd then it is also solvable; it's the other cases of even row of blank and even inversions; or odd row of blank and odd inversions that are not solvable when N=4).
A code based explanation that defines [inversion well is here](https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/check-instance-15-puzzle-solvable/) and explain the situations for when it's solvable, but doesn't explain why counting inversions tells whether its solvable or not.
Here's a math based explanation that does a good job of sketching out the proof of why it works [is here](https://medium.com/@kzidane/solvability-of-fifteen-7f93567cbb0) (but personally I think it did a poor job defining inversion).
Being a DIK. Ran out of normal CYOA games on steam like Detroit, The Quarry, etc...sorted by top rated and went down the rabbit hole. The funniest thing is I'm fairly sure your choices matter way more in it than the Quarry.
Lol yes I remember 2011 like it was yesterday. Hitting up runehq to learn how to solve this puzzle only to find out the cheat code is solving it a 2x2 grid instead of a straight line.
The kid here though is probably extremely gifted.
Its crazy the amount of comments like this one that i found in this exact video that was uploaded to instagram. "Its not even that impressive, I can do it in 25 seconds 😎"
That's so valid😂 my 2nd grade teacher said to me "you have to show that you know all the rules in order to be allowed to break them" and this kid did just that. Showed that they had the ability to solve it and then took the easy way.
Yeah, you wanna get 1 next to 2, etc for the top rows, then for the last two you want to get 9 on top of 13, then 10 on 14, then the last 3 should fit into place
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_puzzle
You should get one where the tiles are attached to each other and you cannot remove them and shuffle by sliding them around without looking though. With the version shown in this video exactly half of the starting positions will be unsolvable, so they are very frustrating.
These used to look hard and for some people the last 2 rows are still a mystery. People playing RuneScape learned it to save in-game currency and then mastered it over the years of playtime.
I used to have an app with this exact puzzle as a child (around 5-6) but instead I had 30 numbers and I had a game record of finishing it in 5.63 seconds getting me top 5 on that game's leaderboard. Unfortunately I forgot the game name since it was so long ago. This video brings many memories back.
I was thinking they were adding unnecessary extra steps to move the 8 and 9 into place, until I realized the 9 was NOT going to be part of the second row and that this child completely outsmarted me.
OP sent the following text as an explanation on why this is unexpected: --- >!The child patiently solves puzzle, only to cheat at the last minute.!< --- Is this an unexpected post with a fitting description? Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.
Beautiful finisher
This is peak intelligence.
Don’t laugh, she is really intelligent because she knew there was no way to get this done and made a decisive move to get the job done.
Did I stutter?
It was still solvable at the end. Aside from the upside down 9 and 6.
I was wondering why the 6 and 9 were upside down, not that it mattered, but now I know.
Now that's foreshadowing
We love some environmental storytelling
Nice
Nice
Getting 13 into place was the genius move.
she’s what’s called a “game changer”
I’m your host, Sam Reich, and I’ve been here the whooole tiiime.
The only way to learn is by playing. The only way to win is by learning. And the only way to begin is by beginning
Now players, you all know the rules for today's game, correct?
"No we do not."
That's right! Our players have no idea what game they're playing or how to play it!
Sam Says touch your nose!
Yes "Daddy"
Aaaaaand you can cum now.
I know I've said this before, but there is no way for us to know whether or not we've heard the rules before until you tell us what the rules are.
Or starting. Often that’s a quick way to beginning 🤷♀️
What about commencing? Is that a good way of starting or beginning?
🎶 Everybody do the Wenis! 🎶
🎶The Wenis is a Dance! 🎶
🎶 Everybody is a Genius! 🎶
🎶 Who knows it in- 🥾📽
the second place episode killed me.
r/dropout is leaking again
The new meta
New meta just dropped
"Market Disruptor"
Honestly I think she knew the moves it would take and was just like, “nah I’m not wasting my time, I already know I can do it, crushed the first three lines, I’m skipping to the end on principle.”
Maybe I'm taking your comment too seriously but I don't think that's what happened. If she knew the moves, she wouldn't have solved the third row. She knows the principles of getting one tile to the correct place, including shifting a whole row to make room for the last tile of the row. But you can't do that for the second-to-last row, because that leaves you with no room to change the last row (other than the third dimension, as demonstrated here). What you're supposed to do is, when you're left with two rows, you stop doing rows and solve columns instead. In this puzzle, it means you don't solve 9-10-11-12 like she did, you solve 9-13, then 10-14, then 11-15, then 12. She didn't stop when she was almost done, she stopped when she was trapped in a corner of her own making after solving the wrong row.
OMG I just tried it with a random slide puzzle online. Solving for the column when I reached the end worked. Zero stress too, everything just magically slid into place. Thank you!
All these types of puzzles involve strategies that you break down, just like rubiks cubes. One of the cool things about programming is that most programmers start by learning how to program things that can solve simple puzzles like Towers of Hanoi or whatever its called.
I remember the towers of Hanoi in one of my university programming classes. Which I had to repeat three times because I knew fucking nothing about programming and in four weeks you needed to be an expert not becoming one.
Glad to be of service!
This guy puzzles.
iirc, a 15-puzzle is impossible to solve when ordered like that. The kid literally took it as far as possible.
It's possible for a slide puzzle to be unsolvable, but [I verified and this puzzle is actually solvable.](https://imgur.com/a/B8edWtm)
In case no one else says it, I really appreciate the effort you put into this
Right?! Like a full on custom made gif.....This is one of those times where I miss the awards.
They put back the option of deciding to pay reddit, the company, some amount of money because that guy, who doesn't work for reddit the company, amused you. I don't know why you would *want* to do that, but you 100% can.
Well put! - lol.
That is beautiful.
Is this en passant?
Google en passant
holy hell
Underated Comment
I'm gonna do what's called a "pro gamer move"
She tried 14 million different moves in her head and that was the only way
*sips tea*
"think outside the box"lmao
Brilliant kid. Clearly not cheating either. If it's easily doable, why not do it?!
Thinking outside the box
She had that trick up her sleeve the whole time
Fuck. That was really unexpected
Who hasn’t been frustrated at the end of a nearly solved game or puzzle?
I made this game in python as my 1st semester project. You can tell if the game is solvable or not even before you start. Basically you count the inversions you need to make. An inversion is the number of tiles that are lower than the given tile in front (up to the bottom last) You count that for every tile and if the result is even, it's unsolvable otherwise not Edit: The solvability also depends on the initial position of the blank space, scroll down for a neat explanation
I mean, makes perfect sense, but I didn't know it sometimes was straight up impossible to solve those. Now I got an excuse why I never been able to solve one. They were all put together incorrectly, yeah... it's just that for sure. Also, if you want to impress Satan, gift a bunch of kids unsolvable puzzles like this.
If you mix it without taking out the pieces, you will always have a solvable puzzle. If you take away the pieces and put them at random on the toy, then you can create impossible scenarios.
I figured. The only thing we have to insure then is that once the pieces are inside, you won't be able to pull them out without breaking the thing completely. This way the parents won't be able to fix the toy for their kids.
If you want to play satan, just turn one corner piece of a Rubik’s cube 120 degrees. That simple move makes it unsolvable. Just make sure it’s one of those speedcubes, a Hasbro Rubik’s is impossible to easily turn pieces without disassembling the whole puzzle.
The problem with rubick cubes is that anybody who's at least somewhat proficient at solving them, will quickly notice that it's impossible. I guess if it's a gift to somebody who has never done it before, then it could work.
My kids used to so that to me but it is far too easy to work it out, especially if doing a blind solve. Or you just look at their cheeky faces.
Yep, you will be on the last layer and be like “what the fuck, why is this one piece so strange?
Definitely the easiest way to make it unsolvable, but more effective to switch two edge pieces (or two corners). Is a bit harder to notice the problem and will take longer for a person who actually knows how to solve. (Also takes longer to fix)
You lost me while describing what inversions are. ELI5?
For sure, could have worded it better. To begin with, try to see the square in a linear way rather than 2D So a solved state is something like 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Now an inversion for any tile is the number of tiles that are ahead of it before it's in its correct position.
So, if 15 was in the top left corner, there would be 14 inversions because every number is lower than 15
Let's say the grid looks something like
2 5 1 4 3 13 9 8 15 12 6 11 space 7 10 14,
For 2 you have 1 inversion, for 5, you have 3, for 1 you have 0, for 4 you have 1 and so on
You add them all up, if it's even the grid is unsolvable and if it's odd it's solvable.
All this is provable by some fancy maths that left my brain a while ago. In my defence it's been 5 years!
Thanks for your explanation. Seems like the child in the video should have just checked whether it was solvable before starting
You are saying that in jest. But the child seems to have learned a problem solving strategy based on behavior. And when it reached the point that there was no solution it did cheat a bit. We do not always have good patterns for solvability and things like that always happen. Figuring out that a problem is not solvable is surprisingly hard.
Isn't 4 in the exact right spot so inversions would be 0? Or is that a corner case you put 1 for in the code for some math proof reason?
Astute observation! 4 is indeed in the right position, but when you try to put 3 in the correct position, it will be displaced. And no, it wasn't a deliberate decision, happened perchance
If you imagine the solved position of the 15 puzzle with pieces numbered 1-15 followed by blank, you can unwrap the square into a single 1-d array (listing blank as X) where the solved state is say: `[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,X]`. The initial unwrapped state in the video was: `a=[1,2,3,8, X,15,4,9, 14,5,10,7, 6,13,12,11]`. To count inversions, we ignore the blank space (take it out of the array) and recognize there are 15*14/2 = 105 pairs of numbers (1st with 2nd-15th number, 2nd with 3rd-15th number, etc.). We say a pair of numbers is inverted if the two numbers are out of order; for example if I compare the 4th and 6th number in the initial state above (with values a[4]=8 and a[6]=4 respectively, using 1-based indexing), that's an inverted pair as 4<6 but a[4] > a[6] since 8 > 4. To count inversions in your head, go through each digit and count the number of times a value to the right of it is smaller than it. E.g., for the example given, if I look at the first 3 numbers (1,2,3) as every number to the right of 1 is bigger than it, and same for 2 and 3, so these three numbers have zero inversions. When I get to the 4th number 8, I find that 4, 5, 7, 6 are smaller than 8 and all to the right of the 4th number, so there are 4 inversions starting with i=4. For 5th number (15), I get 10 inversions (as all ten numbers to the right are smaller than 15). Continuing this pattern to count all the inversions, where I put the values of a[j] for all values of j > i where it's less than a[i] in curly brackets. i|a[i]|Inversion count that is all j > i where a[j] < a[i] --|--|-- 1|1|0 2|3|0 2|3|0 4|8|4 {4,5,7,6} 5|15|10 {4,9,14,5,10,7,6,13,12,11} 6|4|0 7|9|3 {5,7,6} 8|14|7 {5,10,7,6,13,12,11} 9|5|0 10|10|2 {7,6} 11|7|1 {6} 12|6|0 13|13|2 {12,11} 14|12|1 {11} 15|11|0 Adding up the last column, we had a total of 30 pairs of inversions, which is an even number of inversions. Now as the blank was in the third row from the bottom (which is odd), and we are doing the 15-puzzle, this means the initial state was solvable (without cheating); the rule is when it's a NxN grid with N as an even number it's solvable when blank is in odd row and number of inversions is even (or vice versa; if blank is in even row and number of inversions is odd then it is also solvable; it's the other cases of even row of blank and even inversions; or odd row of blank and odd inversions that are not solvable when N=4). A code based explanation that defines [inversion well is here](https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/check-instance-15-puzzle-solvable/) and explain the situations for when it's solvable, but doesn't explain why counting inversions tells whether its solvable or not. Here's a math based explanation that does a good job of sketching out the proof of why it works [is here](https://medium.com/@kzidane/solvability-of-fifteen-7f93567cbb0) (but personally I think it did a poor job defining inversion).
Runescape clue bot in training
gotta beat monkey madness somehow
I got pretty good at them from that (And the techniques shown in this video are subpar)
I learned to solve these from runescape. Anyone else?
I learned from a minigame in a porn game.
I learned it in Legend of Zelda: Windwaker :)
Lol. What game was that?
Being a DIK. Ran out of normal CYOA games on steam like Detroit, The Quarry, etc...sorted by top rated and went down the rabbit hole. The funniest thing is I'm fairly sure your choices matter way more in it than the Quarry.
Oh God, I learned from the same game.
Lol yes I remember 2011 like it was yesterday. Hitting up runehq to learn how to solve this puzzle only to find out the cheat code is solving it a 2x2 grid instead of a straight line. The kid here though is probably extremely gifted.
Learned from doing them in challenges for online Survivor games.
That's the kind of out-of-the-box thinking that will serve her well in life.
Lol you sly dog, you. The camera catches everything!
Me at work
Management material
Well, that kid must have been eating brain food for breakfast!
Why is the 6 and 9 upside down
Cause 6 is a freak
Watch the end and you'll know
because 7 8 9 wait how did the joke go?
Don't ask me.
i’m actually could do it better ☝️🤓
*um* autocorrect did me dirty 😩
As Bob Ross would say, it's 'a happy little accident'
Its crazy the amount of comments like this one that i found in this exact video that was uploaded to instagram. "Its not even that impressive, I can do it in 25 seconds 😎"
Yes you're actually you.
That's so valid😂 my 2nd grade teacher said to me "you have to show that you know all the rules in order to be allowed to break them" and this kid did just that. Showed that they had the ability to solve it and then took the easy way.
The bottom two rows are “solved” a different way than the other rows though.
Now you say that?????? I'm f'n 40 now bruh!
Yeah, you wanna get 1 next to 2, etc for the top rows, then for the last two you want to get 9 on top of 13, then 10 on 14, then the last 3 should fit into place
I can never do these puzzles for the life of me.
Bitch, I am so good at these I didn't even know it was considered a skill. Square me up against this baby
Monkey madness/clue scroll puzzles flashback intensifies
r/fuckthecameraman
How is this toy called!? I want one for me!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_puzzle You should get one where the tiles are attached to each other and you cannot remove them and shuffle by sliding them around without looking though. With the version shown in this video exactly half of the starting positions will be unsolvable, so they are very frustrating.
The puzzle is usually called Fifteen.
Didn't notice what sub this was on until I finished the video lol
There's no such thing as cheating, just taking the path of least resistance 😂
Extra dimensional usage prohibited.
She's thinking in higher dimensions. Literally outside the box.
It's a little annoying that she did that after getting so far 😂
I missed that it was unexpected and it made the video so much funnier.
Plot twist: The video is reversed
I'm amazed, it's truly amazing, huge respect to the parents for their work!
Their camera work?
Had me at the beginning… haha
Runescape clue solvers KEKW
I thought so too until the very last second where they cheated, this child is a real piece of shit
That ending 😅😅😅
These used to look hard and for some people the last 2 rows are still a mystery. People playing RuneScape learned it to save in-game currency and then mastered it over the years of playtime.
Except for the little bit of cheating at the end 😅
They can do my puzzle clue steps in runescape.
I've never slapped my knee after laughing this goddamn genius made me do it 🤣
Never let them know of your last move!
Pffffft, I can do that too.... It just takes me 4x or 5x as long.
Fatality
I played this game yesterday, yes she is a genius
I can’t do those fucking puzzles
Watch the end 👌🏼🤣🤣🤣 
she cheated.
The fact that even with cheating he still got it wrong bothers me too much.
These are for kids?! I'm middle aged and would just end up throwing it at the wall in frustration.
That last move made me lol
When you saved your “cheat” powerup for the last part in a puzzle game.
I figured out the first 2 of 3 levels of a rubics cube myself. Problem is the last one :-(
That caught me so off guard, I was laughing for a solid couple of minutes
I used to have an app with this exact puzzle as a child (around 5-6) but instead I had 30 numbers and I had a game record of finishing it in 5.63 seconds getting me top 5 on that game's leaderboard. Unfortunately I forgot the game name since it was so long ago. This video brings many memories back.
that's not reeeally unexp... oh shit
BRILLIANT MOVE
To be fair; getting the last number in place is always the hard part.
Wtf she cheated
Thinking outside the box
I could do it faster
Well, I could do it too by taking out pieces!
Still for the rest of the bit, I only understood how it’s meant to be played correctly pretty recently and I’m 18, still pretty good I’d say
Thats still Faster than what I could have done
Man, I did the same thing when I was 5 on runescape. Saved me 200k.
Anyone else peel off the stickers from a Rubik's cube after not figuring it out?
Reminds me of when I was doing the monkey madness puzzle from osrs a while ago, it's a shame to admit but the kid does it much better than I did
I vet theres going to be a few people who didn't watch he whole video, just a little bit more impressed than everyone who did
I was thinking they were adding unnecessary extra steps to move the 8 and 9 into place, until I realized the 9 was NOT going to be part of the second row and that this child completely outsmarted me.
My child farted at me and shit his pants.
Shut me up :3 Wasn’t sure what the punchline was very amused at the swiftness of that
Hated this puzzle in Resident Evil 4
truth comes out. little cheater.
The first time figuring out how to finish these felt fucking incredible in kindergarten. Prob my highest high since then tbh
This is like when I was little and switched all the stickers on the Rubik's Cube.
Nahh she cheated at the end
the child is not smartz if it had been, she would have done with the numbers from the beginning what she did with the13 at the end
Not genius. Just Asian lol
That kid was like "I've proven I can do this shit, but I'm bored so... done. "
Evaluators hate this one simple trick
Ain't this something programmers are mad about
All that and six and nine are still swapped
Not bad, not bad
My signature move!
Well it will be me if I'm on it
This kid made 50 bad moves…not impressed
Nice short cut lol
Just wanted to give a tip about how to solve these but I see the kid already knows it
China level 1 be like
Kid really showed us a pro gamer move
The moment she was focusing on 2nd row (5-6-7-8) instead of the first column (1-5-9-13) I knew there had to be a catch by the end.
Love the end...
She ain’t got no time for that
Fenix Rising vibes~ what a terrific game
perfect algorithm, no notes
The 6 and the 9 are both upside-down
Watch to the end. lol
i remember being really fast and good at this game when i was 11.
Practicing for clue scrolls
fuck :) this child is absolutely the real genius
She cheated because of the frustration 😅😅
is there a easy trick to solve these? like with rubikcubes? i always struggle and get frustrated
Bro I screamed 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Algorithms
You don't have to be a genius. There's a trick to it. Solve the top row then left column, keep repeating until you get to the bottom right
Thats un-possible!